<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leaked Google Document on Quality Rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm</link>
	<description>From Cents to Sense!</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Deciphering the Latest Google Slap&#8230; &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-6975</link>
		<dc:creator>Deciphering the Latest Google Slap&#8230; &#124; Super Affiliate Mindset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-6975</guid>
		<description>[...] Also check out these related posts by Adwords Experts (and Good Friends) Josh and Geordie. google slap landing page quality score   Share This Post: These icons link to social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also check out these related posts by Adwords Experts (and Good Friends) Josh and Geordie. google slap landing page quality score   Share This Post: These icons link to social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Latest Google Slap &#124; Digital Products Review</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Latest Google Slap &#124; Digital Products Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>[...] Leaked Google Document on Quality Rating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leaked Google Document on Quality Rating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwexelbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>jwexelbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>Hey Bill,

I believe you are referring to the 'leaked' document named "General Guidelines on Random-Query Evaluation" which was updated on December 31, 2003.

This is a relatively newer document.

See http://www.searchbistro.com/guide.pdf for the older document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bill,</p>
<p>I believe you are referring to the &#8216;leaked&#8217; document named &#8220;General Guidelines on Random-Query Evaluation&#8221; which was updated on December 31, 2003.</p>
<p>This is a relatively newer document.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.searchbistro.com/guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchbistro.com/guide.pdf</a> for the older document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kruse</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappybusiness.com/leaked-google-document-on-quality-rating.htm#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>I believe this is from rather earlier than 2007. The thin affiliate/fat affiliate thing has been around for a few years now. I remember when it first surfaced wondering if Google hadn't leaked it deliberately as this knowledge in the wild would cause people to bring their sites up to Google's standards.

BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this is from rather earlier than 2007. The thin affiliate/fat affiliate thing has been around for a few years now. I remember when it first surfaced wondering if Google hadn&#8217;t leaked it deliberately as this knowledge in the wild would cause people to bring their sites up to Google&#8217;s standards.</p>
<p>BB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
